Prediction of wave parameters by using fuzzy inference system and the parametric models along the south coasts of the Black Sea


Akpinar A., Özger M. , Komurcu M. I.

JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, cilt.19, ss.1-14, 2014 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier

  • Cilt numarası: 19 Konu: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2014
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00773-013-0226-1
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-14

Özet

Forecasting of sea-state characteristics has a great importance in coastal and ocean engineering studies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate performances of Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and several parametric methods in the Black Sea. For this purpose, different fuzzy models with different input combinations were developed for two different wind data sources (TSMS and ECMWF) at two offshore buoy stations. It also aimed to apply several approaches to event-based data sets for wave predictions. Generally, in literature the tendency is to use time series data for wave predictions. In this kind of prediction approach, lagged time series data are taken as inputs and current or future variables are taken as output. In this study, event-based data for each independent storm were extracted from time series data. Simultaneous or concurrent data of wind speed, blowing duration, fetch length and wave characteristics were detected for each single storm. These event data were then used to set up models. The hindcast results were validated with significant wave height and mean wave period data recorded in Hopa and Sinop buoy stations. The performance of developed fuzzy models were also compared with that of four different parametric methods (Wilson, SPM, Jonswap, and CEM methods) applied for two wind data sources at both buoy stations. Finally, it was determined that in the prediction of both wave parameters (H (s) and T (z)) the ANFIS models (R = 0.66, squared correlation coefficient, and MAE = 0.37 m, mean absolute error, for the best model in prediction of H (s)) were more accurate than the parametric methods (R = 0.63 and MAE = 0.75 m for the best model in prediction of H (s)).