A Human Reliability Assessment of Marine Engineering Students through Engine Room Simulator Technology

Kandemir Ç., Çelik M.

SIMULATION & GAMING, vol.52, no.5, pp.635-649, 2021 (ESCI) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 52 Issue: 5
  • Publication Date: 2021
  • Doi Number: 10.1177/10468781211013851
  • Journal Name: SIMULATION & GAMING
  • Journal Indexes: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Periodicals Index Online, ABI/INFORM, Applied Science & Technology Source, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, Communication & Mass Media Index, Computer & Applied Sciences, EBSCO Education Source, Education Abstracts, Educational research abstracts (ERA), Political Science Complete, Psycinfo, Sociological abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.635-649
  • Keywords: simulator technology, human reliability assessment, marine engineering, human error probabilit, MARITIME, ACCIDENTS
  • Istanbul Technical University Affiliated: Yes


Background It is widely accepted that the simulators are important technological instruments which can be utilized as an effective assessment tool in various domains Developing technologies allow the functionality levels of simulators to increase behavioural realism. For this reason, students in higher educations are involved in various useful practices using simulators. Purpose In this respect, simulators can also provide great opportunities to conduct analysis through human error on which this study conceptualized. Model In this context, this study proposes a human error evaluation approach through simulator technology whilst taking advantage of the SOHRA (Shipboard Operation Human Reliability Analysis) method. As a case study, the proposed approach was applied to a simulator environment with the involvement of marine engineering students. Throughout this case, the students were challenged with various error producing conditions (EPCs) while their performances were observed. Results The attendees were achieved good practice when confronted with EPC23 (unreliable instruments), EPC17 (inadequate checking), and EPC5 (spatial & functional incompatibility). However, the points open for improvement are found on EPC2 (time shortage), EPC24 (absolute judgments required), EPC18 (objectives conflict) and EPC9 (technical unlearning). Conclusion This framework can be utilized in simulator-based training activities to increase operational awareness of marine engineering students. The recent developments in simulator technology can boost the effectiveness of the proposed framework.